Display Properties in Mame32 vs. Mame32k, why is K slower?

Give your feedback on Kaillera, make suggestions for new features or improvements to existing features

Moderators: toqer, gothic_hobbit, civilian, okaygo

Display Properties in Mame32 vs. Mame32k, why is K slower?

Postby Kurgan » Wed Feb 05, 2003 7:00 am

I can set games in the latest official mame32 version to 2x hardware stretch with 75% scanlines and full screen (1024x768 res) etc and they play at full speed... I'm talking games like Final Fight here (CPS1/2 games).

But in the latest two mame32K editions they are like 14% speed with these settings.... can TFRs version be optimized with the latest display options of mame 32?


Maybe the problem is I have to enable the 2X zoom option in order to get scanlines. But I can't combine hardware stretch + 75% scanlines, or its slow and choppy on my 1.1 Ghz system with 256 mb ram. : (

I noticed that if I turn off "stretch to full screen" that helps a little, but CPS1 games are still slow, unless I turn off hardware stretch or scanlines (setting it to 0 % for example).
Set your mojob mame color in display to match your stupid ass desktop color to avoid black screen in netplay, fukaz. t(';'t -TFR, AD 2-20-02
Kurgan
"Kaillera For Life"
 
Posts: 593
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2001 12:00 am

Postby Kurgan » Wed Feb 05, 2003 7:04 am

Oh, and my desktop properties match Mame32k and Mame32 (32 bit color, 1024x768 resolution).


Update: Well, technically, Mame32k I don't have set to 1024x768 res, it's just "auto sized".
Set your mojob mame color in display to match your stupid ass desktop color to avoid black screen in netplay, fukaz. t(';'t -TFR, AD 2-20-02
Kurgan
"Kaillera For Life"
 
Posts: 593
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2001 12:00 am


Return to Kaillera Suggestions and Feedback

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron